2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1983 Skoda L
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Skoda L would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 1983 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1983 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1422 kg more than 1983 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Skoda L. (74 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1983 Skoda L | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
| Model | TrailBlazer | L |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4162 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2247 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 38 L |
