2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1986 Fiat Argenta
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Argenta. (131 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1986 Fiat Argenta | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
| Model | TrailBlazer | Argenta |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4162 cc | 1583 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 131 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 71.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 35 L |
