2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 4,155 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP) has 170 more horse power than 1986 Ford Aerostar. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 743 kg more than 1986 Ford Aerostar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Ford Aerostar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | TrailBlazer | Aerostar |
Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4155 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 99 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 68.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2153 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3030 mm |