2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1989 Citroen XM
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (59 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Citroen XM. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Citroen XM. (116 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1989 Citroen XM | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | TrailBlazer | XM |
Year Released | 2005 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4162 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 116 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2470 mm |