2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1992 Rover 100
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1377 kg more than 1992 Rover 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100. (135 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1992 Rover 100 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | TrailBlazer | 100 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4162 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 135 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 79 mm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2247 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1380 mm |