2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford ST 460. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | TrailBlazer | ST 460 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4162 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2580 mm |