2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2001 Nissan MM. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan MM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 330 kg more than 2001 Nissan MM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan MM. (372 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan MM.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2001 Nissan MM | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | TrailBlazer | MM |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2165 kg | 1835 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 106 L |
