2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2001 Volvo SCC
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Volvo SCC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Volvo SCC would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2001 Volvo SCC. (208 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2001 Volvo SCC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 714 kg more than 2001 Volvo SCC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Volvo SCC. (285 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Volvo SCC.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2001 Volvo SCC | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | TrailBlazer | SCC |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2521 cc |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2165 kg | 1451 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 70 L |
