2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2004 Spyker C8
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 803 kg more than 2004 Spyker C8.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Spyker C8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2004 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Spyker |
| Model | TrailBlazer | C8 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4157 cc | 3999 cc |
| Horse Power | 270 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 192 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2153 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 100 L |
