2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2005 Ford E-250
To start off, both 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer and 2005 Ford E-250 were released in the same year (2005). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 57 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (373 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2005 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | TrailBlazer | E-250 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4162 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2247 kg | 2304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 132 L |