2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2009 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2009 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2009 SsangYong Chairman W. (247 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2009 SsangYong Chairman W.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 SsangYong Chairman W. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 SsangYong Chairman W. (343 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 SsangYong Chairman W.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2009 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | Chevrolet | SsangYong |
Model | TrailBlazer | Chairman W |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 3598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 343 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1495 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |