2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,155 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (269 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Calais. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Calais. (350 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Calais.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | TrailBlazer | Calais |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4155 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 373 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |