2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP) has 196 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Micra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | TrailBlazer | Micra |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4162 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 373 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 46 L |