2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 808 kg more than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Lotus Evora. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Lotus Evora. (350 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | TrailBlazer | Evora |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 350 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2247 kg | 1439 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2047 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1229 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2575 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 13.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 60 L |