2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 606 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
Model | TrailBlazer | Countryman |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2084 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 47 L |