2005 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 780 kg more than 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Uplander | 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Studebaker |
| Model | Uplander | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1957 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2777 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2080 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2980 mm |
