2005 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 1962 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 1440 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander (298 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Uplander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Uplander | 1962 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
Model | Uplander | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 53 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 85.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 7.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 33 L |