2005 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 1963 Jaguar MK II
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1963 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 1963 Jaguar MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 657 kg more than 1963 Jaguar MK II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Jaguar MK II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander (298 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jaguar MK II. (195 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Uplander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jaguar MK II.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Uplander | 1963 Jaguar MK II | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Uplander | MK II |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 2482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 195 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2107 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 90 L |