2005 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Uplander. (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Uplander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 295 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Uplander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Uplander | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lincoln |
Model | Uplander | Continental |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 2400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3210 mm |