2005 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 1248 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander (298 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Uplander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Uplander | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Uplander | Herald |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 83 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 69.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2028 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 29 L |