2005 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 1963 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1963 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 1963 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 1145 kg more than 1963 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander (298 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Uplander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Uplander | 1963 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Wartburg |
Model | Uplander | 312 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 6.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 43 L |