2005 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 1964 DKW Munga
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1964 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 995 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Uplander | 1964 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
| Model | Uplander | Munga |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3498 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 31 L |
