2005 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 1966 DKW Munga
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 997 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Uplander | 1966 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
| Model | Uplander | Munga |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3491 cc | 978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2107 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 31 L |
