2005 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 623 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Uplander | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Uplander | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1482 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2760 mm |