2005 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster

To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda Roadster would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (148 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Roadster. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 948 kg more than 2003 Mazda Roadster. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Mazda Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mazda Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander (298 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda Roadster. (167 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Uplander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda Roadster.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet Uplander 2003 Mazda Roadster
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Uplander Roadster
Year Released 2005 2003
Body Type Minivan Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3491 cc 1838 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 200 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 298 Nm 167 Nm
Engine Bore Size 94 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 85 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 7 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2028 kg 1080 kg
Vehicle Length 5200 mm 3960 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1840 mm 1240 mm
Wheelbase Size 3080 mm 2270 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 95 L 48 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]