2005 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-350 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Uplander. (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Uplander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 460 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Uplander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Uplander. (299 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Uplander.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Uplander | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Uplander | E-350 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 299 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 90.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 106 mm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2028 kg | 2488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 132 L |