2005 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Uplander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Uplander would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 602 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chevrolet Uplander. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander (298 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Uplander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Uplander | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
| Model | Uplander | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2080 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 47 L |
