2005 Chevrolet Vivant vs. 1968 Mini MK II
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Vivant is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mini MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mini MK II would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Vivant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Vivant (120 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1968 Mini MK II. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Vivant should accelerate faster than 1968 Mini MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Vivant weights approximately 698 kg more than 1968 Mini MK II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Vivant (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mini MK II. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Vivant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mini MK II.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Vivant | 1968 Mini MK II | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
Model | Vivant | MK II |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 61 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1308 kg | 610 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2040 mm |