2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 1963 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1963 Toyota Corona. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1963 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 769 kg more than 1963 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 Nm) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Toyota Corona. (68 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 1963 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | 300 | Corona |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 68 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 78 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3190 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 75 L |