2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 1966 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 6,385 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Mustang (320 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 530 kg more than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 Nm) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Mustang. (85 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler 300 | 1966 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | 300 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3516 cc | 6385 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 320 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 102.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 96 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 1179 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 45 L |
