2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (115 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 1139 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (529 Nm) has 382 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Lotus Elan. (147 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | 300 | Elan |
Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5653 cc | 1557 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 147 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 72.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 696 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 45 L |