2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 1972 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,753 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1972 Ford Mustang. (178 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1972 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 182 kg more than 1972 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Mustang (385 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (340 Nm). This means 1972 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 1972 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | Mustang |
Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 5753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 178 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 385 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 88.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 8.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 1527 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3190 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 87 L |