2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 1973 Holden UTE
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Holden UTE would be higher. At 5,047 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Holden UTE (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (190 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Let's talk about torque, 1973 Holden UTE (427 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (258 Nm). This means 1973 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler 300 | 1973 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | 300 | UTE |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1973 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2776 cc | 5047 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 75 L |
