2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 1982 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (254 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1982 Ford Fairlane. (125 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 480 kg more than 1982 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (332 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Fairlane. (296 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Fairlane.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 1982 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 4093 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 125 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 296 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2950 mm |