2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 1982 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 270 more horse power than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 885 kg more than 1982 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (529 Nm) has 408 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 1982 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
Model | 300 | Lynx |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5653 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 121 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.8:1 |
Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2400 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 43 L |