2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 1996 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,707 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1996 Ford Falcon. (228 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 129 kg more than 1996 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Falcon (398 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (340 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 1996 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 3707 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 398 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3190 mm | 2800 mm |