2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL (349 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 111 kg more than 2005 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL (530 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (340 Nm). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 1998 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 300 | SL |
Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 5439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 349 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 530 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 18.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 12.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 80 L |