2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 411 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Artic. (325 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Artic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler 300 | 2000 Ford Artic | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | 300 | Artic |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3516 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 1298 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 68 L |
