2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2000 Ford Cougar
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Cougar would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2000 Ford Cougar. (129 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 379 kg more than 2000 Ford Cougar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Cougar. (176 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Cougar.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2000 Ford Cougar | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | Cougar |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 84.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 87.9 mm |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3190 mm | 2710 mm |