2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph (318 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (254 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph weights approximately 424 kg more than 2005 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph (489 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (332 Nm). This means 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph | |
Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
Model | 300 | Silver Seraph |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 5379 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 489 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 79 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 2304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 3070 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 94 L |