2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2000 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (335 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 2000 Smart ForTwo. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2000 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 1064 kg more than 2000 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (529 Nm) has 429 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Smart ForTwo. (100 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2000 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Chrysler | Smart |
Model | 300 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 40 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 100 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 18.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 816 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 3.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 22 L |