2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2002 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Explorer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Explorer would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2002 Ford Explorer. (210 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Explorer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Explorer weights approximately 385 kg more than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Explorer (335 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (332 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2002 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | Explorer |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 4009 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 335 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 100.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 84.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 1939 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 15.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 85 L |