2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2002 Ford Tonka
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Tonka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Tonka would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2002 Ford Tonka. (128 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Tonka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 407 kg more than 2002 Ford Tonka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Tonka (814 Nm) has 474 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (340 Nm). This means 2002 Ford Tonka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2002 Ford Tonka | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | Tonka |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 814 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 1302 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 6150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2370 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3190 mm | 4200 mm |