2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2002 Holden Astra
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden Astra would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2002 Holden Astra. (120 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2002 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 559 kg more than 2002 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Holden Astra. (165 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Holden Astra.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2002 Holden Astra | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | 300 | Astra |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 165 Nm |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3190 mm | 2610 mm |