2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (342 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 89 kg more than 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (520 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (340 Nm). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 300 | CLK |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 5439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 342 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 520 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3190 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 62 L |