2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 258 kg more than 2002 Volvo S60.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo S60 (400 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (340 Nm). This means 2002 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | 300 | S60 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 400 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 93.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 68 L |