2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2003 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (335 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 400 kg more than 2003 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Mustang (556 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (529 Nm). This means 2003 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2003 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | Mustang |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 4599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 556 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 68 L |