2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,776 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (190 HP) has 120 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 1075 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (258 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler 300 | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Chrysler | MCC |
| Model | 300 | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 2776 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 1810 mm |
