2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2004 MG ZT
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MG ZT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MG ZT would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2004 MG ZT. (175 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2004 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 224 kg more than 2004 MG ZT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MG ZT. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MG ZT.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2004 MG ZT | |
Make | Chrysler | MG |
Model | 300 | ZT |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 2495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3190 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |