2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 75 (256 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (254 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 200 kg more than 2004 Rover 75.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Rover 75 (418 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (332 Nm). This means 2004 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | 300 | 75 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 418 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 10.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 18.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 13.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 54 L |